Ripple (XRP) Legal Case: Strong Arguments in Joint Motion Revealed!

Updated

June 16, 2025

Gambar Ripple (XRP) Legal Case: Strong Arguments in Joint Motion Revealed!

Jakarta, Pintu News – Attorney Bill Morgan recently revealed the strongest arguments in a joint motion filed by Ripple Labs and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding the four-year-long Ripple legal case. Both parties are striving to end this legal dispute through a motion filed with Judge Analisa Torres.

The Strongest Argument in a Joint Motion

According to Bill Morgan, the most convincing argument in the joint motion filed was the request for modification of the final judgment as a key condition in the settlement agreement between Ripple and the SEC. The motion asks Judge Analisa Torres to amend the final judgment, which includes the dissolution of the injunction prohibiting the sale of Ripple (XRP) to institutions and the modification of the allocation of fines, with the SEC retaining $50 million and Ripple receiving $75 million of the funds held in escrow.

This argument was considered strong as it could save court resources from endless litigation. In addition, the motion also included other arguments to qualify exceptional circumstances, including a change in SEC policy and a series of case dismissals.

Critique of Joint Motion

Although Bill Morgan highlighted the strength of the arguments in the joint motion, some critics pointed out many reasons why the court might reject the motion. The legal standard for exceptional circumstances is very high, and the intention to settle may not meet those requirements.

Morgan noted that both sides in the Ripple (XRP) case could end their appeals without the need to modify Judge Torres’ final ruling. Critics argue that both sides are putting pressure on the court to change its decision, which could back the judge into a corner. However, Morgan has previously revealed that approval of the joint motion is likely to be granted even if the arguments lack strength.

Possible Court Decision

There are rumors that a decision could fall on Monday morning, however Bill Morgan argues that an early decision may signal the denial of the motion. The lawyer noted that it only took 7 days for Judge Torres to deny the previous joint motion, and the request for an early ruling may not be favorable for either side.

Despite the perceived weaknesses, pro-Ripple lawyer John Deaton sees a 70% chance that Judge Torres will approve the motion. This suggests that there is still hope for Ripple (XRP) to reach a favorable resolution in this legal case.

Conclusion

The Ripple (XRP) legal case continues to attract attention from various parties, both supporters and critics. The upcoming decision from Judge Analisa Torres will not only determine the fate of Ripple (XRP) but could also set an important precedent for similar cases in the future. Observers and investors around the world are waiting with great anticipation to see how this case will end.

Also Read: Crypto Market Optimism: Can Optimism (OP) Break $0.72?

That’s the latest information about crypto. Follow us on Google News for the latest crypto and blockchain technology updates. Enjoy an easy and secure crypto trading experience by downloading Pintu crypto app via Google Play Store or App Store now.

Experience web trading with advanced trading tools such as pro charting, various order types, and portfolio tracker only at Pintu Pro. Pintu Pro Futures is also available, where you can buy bitcoin leverage, trade btc futures, eth futures and sol futures easily from your desktop!

*Disclaimer

This content aims to enrich readers’ information. Pintu collects this information from various relevant sources and is not influenced by outside parties. Note that an asset’s past performance does not determine its projected future performance. Crypto trading activities are subject to high risk and volatility, always do your own research and use cold hard cash before investing. All activities of buying andselling Bitcoin and other crypto asset investments are the responsibility of the reader.